Fellows Composite Ranking

Curated shortlist for leadership review · 15 Senior + 25 Visiting candidates

Senior Fellows

Established names · deeper FEE relationship

Visiting Fellows

Junior / rising voices

Composite score (max 110): Nominations weighted heavily (10 pts/nom, max 40) · Public reach max 25 · Mission fit max 20 · Speaker/writer quality max 15 · Brand elevation max 10.

Stacked-bar width below = points contributed to composite. Longer bar = higher total. Segment widths show composition.

Nominations

Public reach

Mission fit

Writing/speaking

Brand elevation

Leadership input — please fill this out

Two separate rankings, each with its own 50-point budget. Allocate within each pool independently. Your input auto-saves in this browser.

Points (0–20 per candidate, 50 total per pool): allocate weight within each pool independently.
Must-have (max 2 per pool): candidates FEE should offer regardless. Add a one-line reason.
Hard-no (max 2 per pool): candidates you think would be a mistake. Add a one-line reason.

Your name:

Senior pool15 picks

0/50 points

0/2 must-have

0/2 hard-no

Visiting pool25 picks

0/50 points

0/2 must-have

0/2 hard-no

Submit your input

When you're done, click submit. Your input goes to the team's shared sheet — only people with access to this page can submit or view results.

Submissions AggregatorAdminAdmin view

Pulls all submissions from the shared sheet and aggregates point allocations, must-haves, and hard-nos across the team.

🔒 Locked until you submit

Submit your own picks first using the panel above. We hide the team's aggregated view until everyone has independently weighed in — keeps your judgment unanchored from others'.

Offline fallback: drop JSON files or paste manually

Drag & drop JSON files here or click to select